Best Cordless Vacuums in 2024 [Over 30 Tested]

Best Cordless Vacuum - some of the brands I've reviewed

Some of the cordless vacuums I’ve tested. Trust me, there’s a lot more.

Struggling to navigate the vast sea of cordless vacuums? Look no further.

Over 30 models were rigorously tested, including two wet/dry options.

I’m here to cut through the clutter and guide you to the ideal choice that suits your needs.

These are a mixture of products I purchased and sent to me, but I can assure you that these are honest reviews since I don’t sugarcoat anything.

I’ll say the good, the bad, and the ugly head-on, ensuring you get the real scoop minus the fluff.

I compare each category’s most popular alternatives, including cordless stick vacuums, handheld, robot, and soon upright ones.

Exhaustive tests are done on various facets, such as suction power, cleaning performance, filtration, run time, and more.

For products like robot vacuums, I do additional experiments for navigation, obstacle avoidance, and many more.

I’ve categorized this list based on price (check below) and a special section for robot vacuums as a preview.

Update for 2024: I’ve been busy testing new cordless vacuum cleaners.

Over the past few months, I’ve written about the Dyson Gen5 Detect, Gen5 Outsize, and the V15S Submarine (soon).

Other reviews are in the pipeline, namely the newer Shark cordless vacuum models like the UZ565H Pro with Clean Sense and several corded vacuums with the intent of comparing them to their cordless counterparts. Stand by for that.

So, these are exciting times for the industry.

An Overview of the Best Cordless Vacuums

Below is a summary of the test results, including run time, noise, and product specifications.

It doesn’t include all the tests, so you’ll need to read the individual reviews to see them all.

You’ll see a list of the products I’ve thoroughly tested, so if I omit something that you think should be on here, reach out, and I’ll try to test the product.

Also, I didn’t include handhelds in the list, as cordless vacuums should be versatile enough to be used on floors and above to justify their cost.

Best Premium Cordless Vacuums

Best Premium Cordless Vacuums

Some of the premium options include the LG CordZezo A9, Dyson Outsize, V15, and V11, Miele Triflex, and Tineco Pure One S12

Premium cordless vacuums are priced above $500.

These variants are the cream-of-the-crop options with the most power and longest run time.

These models have the highest air flow and suction figures and typically will have the best results at cleaning embedded debris on carpets.

Another benefit of these premium vacuums is the fit and finish. Most have a quick-release lever, so interchanging accessories will be straightforward.

Unfortunately, these products are costly.

Best Overall: Dyson V15 Detect

Dyson V15 Detect

Airflow: 73 CFM πŸ“ Dust bin size: 0.77 liters πŸ“ Fog Test: No Leaks πŸ“ Sand on hard floor: 99.8% πŸ“ Deep Cleaning: 100% πŸ“ Weight: 6.8 lbs πŸ“ Run time: up to 84:19 mins. πŸ“ Recharge: 4.5 hrs. πŸ“ Battery: 3600 mAh Li-ion πŸ“ Noise: 80.8 dB πŸ“ Warranty: 2 yrs. πŸ“ Self-Standing: No
 
πŸ‘ Pros: Best all-around performance, Tracks dust, Lengthy run time, Excellent at vacuuming long hair

πŸ‘Ž Cons: Crazy expensive, Hard to push on plush rugs (or thicker carpet)
 
CHECK PRICE ON AMAZON

CHECK PRICE ON WALMART

DETAILED DYSON V15 REVIEW
 
The V15 Detect is a culmination of all the technology from Dyson’s extensive R&D. It’s the best all-around performer on bare floors and carpeting, thanks to the high airflow. The most notable of these is the green laser that accentuates dust. I’ve tested many cordless vacuums that utilize bright LED headlights (Shark ION P50) but cannot match the V15 with highlighting dust particles. The standard brush roll also gets upgraded with these combs, helping it resist tangles better. It’s one of the best at resisting tangles from long hair strands (more than 10″). And the icing on the cake is this torque screw tool that’s the best mini turbo brush attachment for picking long hair. These innovations make the V15 Detect the best cordless vacuum I’ve tested, not just on floors but also on upholstery. Unfortunately, this vacuum isn’t perfect, and the most glaring issue is the price. The V15 Detect is expensive and the biggest roadblock for most people from purchasing it.

Most Tools: Tineco Pure One S12

Tineco Pure One S12

Airflow: 61.72 CFM πŸ“ Dust bin size: 0.6 liters πŸ“ Fog Test: Some Leaks πŸ“ Sand on hard floor: 99.9% πŸ“ Deep Cleaning: 98.3% πŸ“ Weight: 6.6 lbs. πŸ“ Run time: up to 51:21 mins. x 2 πŸ“ Recharge: 4.5 hrs. πŸ“ Battery: 2500 mAh Li-ion πŸ“ Noise: 70.4 dB πŸ“ Warranty: 2 yrs. πŸ“ Self-Standing: No
 
πŸ‘ Pros: Great at picking up surface debris, lots of tools, two batteries, cheaper alternative, decent at cleaning embedded sand

πŸ‘Ž Cons: Less suction, Filtration isn’t fully sealed
 
CHECK PRICE ON AMAZON

CHECK PRICE ON WALMART

DETAILED TINECO PURE ONE S12 REVIEW
 
The Tineco Pure One S12 is an underrated option and should be on your list of cordless vacuum alternatives. It doesn’t have the same level of technology or power, but this model is cheaper than the V15, with nearly the same vacuuming performance as older Dyson models. It has 13 tools (including the extension tube) with an extra long crevice tool for cleaning those hard-to-reach spots. Unfortunately, it has less airflow than the V15 Detect. Thus, it won’t clean embedded dirt as efficiently.

Upright-Like Capacity: Lupe Pure Cordless

Lupe Pure Full Body Shot

Airflow: 43.06 CFM πŸ“ Dust bin size: 1.0 liters πŸ“ Fog Test: Some Leaks πŸ“ Sand on hard floor: 99.82% πŸ“ Deep Cleaning: 99.9% πŸ“ Weight: 10.14 lbs. πŸ“ Run time: up to 60 mins. πŸ“ Recharge: 3.5 hrs. πŸ“ Battery: 9 Murata high drain, high capacity Li-ion πŸ“ Noise: 81.7 dB πŸ“ Warranty: 2 yrs. πŸ“ Self-Standing: Yes
 
πŸ‘ Pros: High dustbin volume, self-standing, versatile configuration options, decent run time, capable deep cleaning alternative

πŸ‘Ž Cons: Longer strands will wrap on the brush, expensive
 
CHECK PRICE ON LUPE’S WEBSITE

DETAILED LUPE PURE REVIEW
 
The Lupe Pure Cordless is not your typical cordless stick vacuum. It’s designed to be biased against a Dyson, meaning everything is analog – there’s no LCD screen, and it uses button switches. But it performs at a premium level and is one of the best during the deep cleaning experiments (99.9%). Some downsides include the lack of a sealed filtration system and the subpar results in the hair wrap test, at least with longer strands.

Lightweight Option: Dyson V12 Detect

Dyson V12 Detect

Airflow: 58.74 CFM πŸ“ Dust bin size: 0.35 liters πŸ“ Fog Test: No Leaks πŸ“ Sand on hard floor: 99.9% πŸ“ Deep Cleaning: 94.1% πŸ“ Weight: 5.2 lbs. πŸ“ Run time: up to 63 mins. πŸ“ Recharge: 3-4 hrs. πŸ“ Battery: 2000 mAh Li-ion πŸ“ Noise: 78.4 dB πŸ“ Warranty: 1 yr. πŸ“ Self-Standing: No
 
πŸ‘ Pros: Lightweight version of the V15, cheaper option, push button switch, excellent in its handheld configuration

πŸ‘Ž Cons: Tiny dustbin, still expensive
 
CHECK PRICE ON AMAZON

DETAILED DYSON V12 REVIEW
 
The Dyson V12 Detect is a lighter version of the V15 Detect – an excellent alternative for consumers who value ergonomics over cleaning performance. It doesn’t have the same power as its more expensive sibling but makes up for it with its lightweight frame. Fortunately, the lower airflow doesn’t affect its performance on hard floors since it has the same efficient pick-up.

Looking for something more specific?

Best Mid-Priced Options

Best Mid Priced Cordless Vacuums

Mid-priced options include Shark, Tineco A10 and A11, and the Dyson V8 (and more).

Mid-priced cord-free vacuums range between $200 and under $450. It is not as powerful as its premium counterparts, but these models still provide excellent value at a lower cost.

Don’t expect these options to be as good as a high-end stick vacuum at deep cleaning carpets, but these are still decent options for homes with a mix of hard floors and carpets.

But some gems here work well on hard floors, namely the Shark Vertex Cordless and the Dyson Omni Glide.

Excellent on Hard Floors: Shark Vertex Pro Cordless

Shark Vertex Pro cordless quick-release latch

Airflow: 48.25 CFM πŸ“ Dust bin size: 1.28 liters πŸ“ Fog Test: No Leaks πŸ“ Sand on hard floor: 99.4% πŸ“ Fog Test: No Leaks πŸ“ Deep Cleaning: 92.75% πŸ“ Weight: 9.04 lbs. πŸ“ Run time: up to 101 mins. πŸ“ Recharge: 4 hrs. πŸ“ Battery: 2350 mAh Li-ion πŸ“ Noise: 89.4 dB πŸ“ Warranty: 2 yrs. πŸ“ Self-Standing: Yes
 
πŸ‘ Pros: Redesigned DuoClean nozzle excellent at vacuuming long hair, self-standing, large dustbin, detachable battery, excellent especially on hard floors

πŸ‘Ž Cons: Noisy, subpar run time
 
BUY NOW ON AMAZON

BUY NOW ON WALMART

DETAILED SHARK VERTEX PRO REVIEW
 
Shark is one of the innovators I’m talking about earlier, and their innovation is the Duo Clean system. The Vertex Pro improved upon the issues with its older sibling. This model runs longer since it comes with two batteries and has an improved interface with buttons instead of a slide switch. One downgrade is the lower airflow, so there’s a slight degradation in cleaning performance.

Best Steering [Hard Floors]: Dyson Omni Glide

Dyson Omni Glide full body

Airflow: 31.94 CFM πŸ“ Dust bin size: 0.18 liters πŸ“ Fog Test: No Leaks πŸ“ Sand on hard floor: 99.35% πŸ“ Deep Cleaning: N/A πŸ“ Weight: 4.18 lbs. πŸ“ Run time: up to 23:30 mins. πŸ“ Recharge: 3.5 hrs. πŸ“ Battery: 2500 mAh Li-ion πŸ“ Noise: 76 dB πŸ“ Warranty: 2 yrs. πŸ“ Self-Standing: No
 
πŸ‘ Pros: First 360-degree steering, lightweight, short run time, can’t pick up on carpet

πŸ‘ Cons: Small dustbin, noisy
 
CHECK PRICE ON AMAZON

CHECK PRICE ON WALMART

DETAILED DYSON OMNI GLIDE REVIEW
 
Most vacuum cleaners go in four directions: forward, backward, left, and right, but the Omni Glide breaks that mold with its industry-first 360-degree steering. Dyson makes this possible with the twin roller system and four caster wheels underneath, making it possible to make a complete turn while vacuuming in both directions. The streamlined frame deviates from typical Dyson stick vacuums and makes the Omni Glide unique, allowing it to reach deeper under furniture than any Dyson product. I love how this feature translates to real-world use, and I’ve been using it extensively in cleaning my home. The Omni Glide is an excellent alternative inside tiny homes with hard floors. But it’s not usable on carpet since the rollers won’t spin even on light area rugs. The cylindrical design isn’t optimal for handheld use, but it’s still usable, though not as good as the Micro 1.5KG.

Value for Money: Tineco A11

Tineco A11

Airflow: 58 CFM πŸ“ Dust bin size: 0.6 liters πŸ“ Fog Test: Some Leaks πŸ“ Sand on hard floor: 99.4% πŸ“ Deep Cleaning: 96.45% πŸ“ Weight: 3.74 lbs. πŸ“ Run time: up to 26:44 mins. x 2 πŸ“ Recharge: 3.5 – 4 hrs. πŸ“ Battery: 2,000 mAH Li-ion πŸ“ Noise: 75.4 dB πŸ“ Warranty: 2 yrs. πŸ“ Self-Standing: No
 
πŸ‘ Pros: Superb debris pick up, lots of tools, lightweight frame, above-average deep cleaning

πŸ‘Ž Cons: Short run time, noisy, shallow turning radius
 
CHECK PRICE ON AMAZON

CHECK PRICE ON WALMART

DETAILED TINECO A11 REVIEW
 

The Tineco A11 is (perhaps) the best value-for-money option of the stick vacuums I’ve tested, providing high-end cleaning at a mid-level price. Tineco is a brand trying to unseat Dyson in the cordless vacuum niche, and the A11 is one of their outstanding products. Depending on the variant you choose, it comes with only the standard nozzle or includes the soft roller attachment. One selling point for the A11 is the sheer number of attachments. These tools are helpful in their own right, factoring in the lightweight body. The A11 is excellent for above-the-floor use. There’s no glaring issue with the A11, but the biggest concern with this vacuum is its steering.

Best Budget Alternatives

Lastly are the cheap cordless vacuums. These variants are the least expensive and excellent for budget-conscious folks looking for a bang-for-the-buck cordless vacuum.

Surprisingly, some alternatives here have above-average airflow.

Thus, the cleaning performance difference isn’t far from their mid-priced or premium counterparts.

The biggest downside to these affordable alternatives is the lack of filtration. Despite claims of HEPA filtration, none passed the fog test.

So that means fine bits of dust and allergens will seep through the exhaust.

It’s not something I’d recommend for allergy sufferers.

Best Budget Alternative: TIneco A10

Tineco A10 has the same design cues as the Dyson V8

Airflow: 51 CFM. πŸ“ Dust bin size: 0.4 liters πŸ“ Fog Test: Heavy Leaks πŸ“ Sand on hard floor: 99.8% πŸ“ Deep Cleaning: 94.7% πŸ“ Weight: 2.87 lbs. πŸ“ Run time: up to 26:44 mins. πŸ“ Recharge: 3 to 4 hrs. πŸ“ Battery: 2500 mAh Li-ion πŸ“ Noise: 77.7dB πŸ“ Warranty: 2 yrs. πŸ“ Self-Standing: No
 
πŸ‘ Pros: Excellent performance all-around, above-average deep cleaning, cheap sub $200 alternative

πŸ‘Ž Cons: Noisy, not so shark steering
 
CHECK PRICE ON AMAZON

CHECK PRICE ON WALMART

DETAILED TINECO A10 REVIEW
 
 The best budget alternative right now is the Tineco A10. Once priced at the mid-level range, Tineco’s new releases pushed its price down. So, this isn’t your typical budget cordless vacuum. It possesses above-average airflow and a brush roll similar to the more expensive Tineco A11. Therefore, it’s no surprise that it performs closely to the Tineco A11.

Above-Average Cleaning: Moosoo K17

Airflow: 41.31 CFM πŸ“ Dust bin size: 0.5 liters πŸ“ Fog Test: Heavy Leaks πŸ“ Sand on hard floor: 99.8% πŸ“ Deep Cleaning: 89.4% πŸ“ Weight: 2.79 lbs. πŸ“ Run time: up to 30 mins. πŸ“ Recharge: 4 hrs. πŸ“ Battery: 2200 mAh Li-ion πŸ“ Noise: 71.2 dB πŸ“ Warranty: 1 yr. πŸ“ Self-Standing: No
 
πŸ‘ Pros: Cheap option, surprisingly good debris pick up, lightweight

πŸ‘Ž Cons: Poor filtration, noisy

CHECK PRICE ON WALMART

DETAILED MOOSOO K17 REVIEW
 

Last but not least on this list is the Moosoo K17. This budget stick vacuum is one of the best-performing options on the list and another excellent value option for budget-conscious shoppers. It picked up a very high percentage with surface and deep cleaning tests. But don’t expect too much from it with fit and finish, as it won’t have the same quality as premium brands. Nonetheless, it’s excellent at debris pick-up, which is why it’s so popular. Unfortunately, the Moosoo K17 is no longer available on Amazon but still is on stores like Walmart and Moosoo’s website. Another issue with the K17 is its lack of filtration, as with most budget cordless vacuums.

Best Robot Vacuums

Roomba Combo J7 vs. Roborock S7

Some of the best robot vacuum options include the Roborock S7+ and Roomba Combo J7+

Robot vacuums are excellent alternatives for people who want to automate the vacuuming task. 

Technology has improved to the point that these are viable alternatives because of the latest navigation and battery technology enhancements.

One (obvious) downside is the higher price compared to a stick vacuum because of the added technology and sophistication.

Brands like Roborock and iRobot are the most popular options.

Still, brands like Yeedi, Shark, and Dreame offer consumers alternative options if Roomba or Roborock is too costly.

Most Autonomous: Roborock S7 MaxV Ultra

Roborock S7 MaxV ReactiveAI 2.0

Airflow: 13.39 CFM πŸ“ Sand on Hard Floor: 99.6% πŸ“ Deep Cleaning: 77.95%

Side brush: One πŸ“ Brush roll: Twin rubber extractors

Navigation: LIDAR + Front Camera πŸ“ Map saving: Yes πŸ“ Number of maps: 4 πŸ“ Containment: Yes πŸ“ Selective Room cleaning: Yes πŸ“ Recharge & Resume: Yes

Self-Empty: Yes πŸ“ Bag capacity: 2.5liters πŸ“ Dustbin capacity: 400ml

Mopping: Yes πŸ“ Clean water tank capacity: 3 liters πŸ“ Dirty water tank capacity: 2.5 liters πŸ“ Water tank (inside robot): 200ml

Side brush: One πŸ“ Brush roll: Twin rubber extractors

Battery: 5200 mAh Li-ion πŸ“ Run time: 180 minutes πŸ“ Noise: 72.9 dB
 
πŸ‘ Pros: Efficient navigation, do-it-all base station, above-average surface vacuuming performance

πŸ‘Ž Cons: Costly, base station takes up lots of space
 
CHECK PRICE ON AMAZON

CHECK PRICE ON WALMART

DETAILED ROBOROCK S7 MAXV ULTRA REVIEW

The S7 MaxV Ultra is one of Roborock’s latest products and the first with pad-washing and self-emptying features. With the unveiling of the S8 MaxV Ultra, expect the S7 MaxV price to trickle down, which is excellent news to consumers because of its cost savings. This is the best robot vacuum (for now) because it combines efficient navigation, obstacle avoidance, hands-free convenience, a feature-rich app, and above-average cleaning performance. It doesn’t have the deep cleaning capability of a Roomba, but its above-average surface debris cleaning, mopping, and proficient navigation make up for this deficiency. One significant roadblock is the hefty price tag. The Roborock S7 MaxV Ultra is (easily) one of the more expensive options available.

Cheaper Option: Dreame L10S Ultra

Dreame L10S Ultra docked

Airflow: 14.98 CFM πŸ“ Sand on Hard Floor: 98.3% πŸ“ Deep Cleaning: 77.95%

Side brush: One πŸ“ Brush roll: All-rubber brush

Navigation: LIDAR + Front Camera πŸ“ Map saving: Yes πŸ“ Number of maps: 4 πŸ“ Containment: Yes πŸ“ Selective Room cleaning: Yes πŸ“ Recharge & Resume: Yes

Self-Empty: Yes πŸ“ Bag capacity: 2.5liters πŸ“ Dustbin capacity: 350 ml

Mopping: Yes πŸ“ Clean water tank capacity: 2.5 liters πŸ“ Dirty water tank capacity: 2.4 liters πŸ“ Water tank (inside robot): N/A

Battery: 5200 mAh Li-ion πŸ“ Run time: 210 mins πŸ“ Noise: 63.6 dB
 
πŸ‘ Pros: Cheaper than a Roborock, proficient navigation, not very noisy, above-average mopping performance

πŸ‘Ž Cons: Not as good at avoiding objects, tall base station
 
CHECK PRICE ON AMAZON

DETAILED DREAME L10S REVIEW
 
A cheaper alternative to the Roborock S7 MaxV Ultra is the Dreame L10S Ultra, which has a versatile base station capable of washing the pads and emptying the dustbin. While it picked up the same percentage in the deep cleaning experiment, the surface cleaning wasn’t as good because of the weaker suction. Thus, it doesn’t vacuum surface debris as efficiently. Nonetheless, it’s a cheaper alternative worth considering if the S7 MaxV is too costly.

Why Should You Trust This Comparison?

Cordless Vacuums

One simple reason is that I’ve done comprehensive tests for each product.

I’ve spent countless hours testing each cordless vacuum to gather the data needed for this comparison.

These comprehensive tests include cleaning tests on surface and embedded dirt, run time, filtration, usability, and more.

I then tabulate these results on a spreadsheet to see how each model fares against the other.

Most of the products featured in this comparison are purchased to prevent bias, but I don’t hesitate to share the bad points even with the manufacturer-sent items.

That’s why I don’t accept payments for these products, but the item itself is enough.

I’ll admit, when I started this site nearly a decade ago, I was one of those sites that regurgitated information.

However, I pivoted to testing products when an opportunity came up. And I’ve been doing so ever since.

Hence, you’ll still see old articles in which I did not test the product. But I’m saying this for transparency’s sake.

How I Test These Vacuums?

Here’s the list of experiments I put in every cordless vacuum I review.

These tests can take several days to complete and are exhaustive in checking how each product holds up.

1. Cleaning Tests

Dyson V10 torque drive on hard floor

One of the most critical of these experiments is the cleaning test.

I put these vacuums through a grueling series of tests on different debris types, from coffee grounds, pet litter, quinoa, sand, hair, quaker oats, and more.

These experiments aim to check how well these products pick up debris on surfaces, such as hard floors and lowβ€”and mid-pile carpets.

I used 50 grams for surface debris experiments and 100 grams for deep cleaning tests.

2. Airflow and Suction Power Tests

Manufacturers don’t have a universal metric for disclosing suction, so I use three tools to measure airflow and suction.

These are the anemometer, water lift gauge, and Y-gauge.

Please realize that I’m not the first to use them as other YouTube Vloggers have used these to check suction, but these are practical tools, so I use them.

After countless tests, I found a correlation between high airflow and good cleaning performance on carpets.

Sure, other factors come into consideration, like nozzle design, but airflow is critical, at least on carpets.

I do three suction experiments.

The first is a direct test using a water lift gauge and a short pipe as a bridge.

It’s not the most accurate since high-suction vacuums like Dyson flash an “airway obstructed” error, and there’s no way to get a consistent baseline result.

Water lift direct suction test

I used to drill a hole to act as a release valve, but this only works for cordless vacuums with less suction.

Even with this hole, high-powered models still have that blockage error.

The subsequent trial is an unsealed test using a water lift gauge and Y-gauge.

Y-gauge test unsealed test

It’s the most accurate suction test since it has the least number of variables involved.

The last test is the sealed test with the water lift and Y-gauge, where I cover the open end with my palm.

Y-gauge sealed test

3. Fog test

Fog test

Another important consideration when choosing a cordless vacuum is filtration.

Many brands claim HEPA filtration, but what’s their proof? One method is using a fog machine.

It provides a visual cue if the vacuum can keep the fog inside. The fog represents debris inside the dustbin.

This experiment tests not only the filter but also the seals around it. Not many cordless pass this test, which you’ll find out later.

4. Run time test

Run time test

How long a cordless vacuum will run is another critical component of a cordless vacuum.

With the improved battery technology, these machines will run further than ever.

The testing process is simple: turn on the vacuum and time it with a mobile phone timer until the battery runs out.

I do these tests with the main nozzle and non-powered tools to give consumers a more realistic expectation of how long a product will run.

But note that these results can degrade over time as Li-ion batteries have a fixed number of charge and recharge cycles before deteriorating.

However, good brands will provide a few years of excellent service with proper battery care, and popular brands like Dyson have a wide range of replacement battery alternatives.

5. Ergonomics [Steering, Handle Weight, and Overall Weight]

Next in line is ergonomics. There’s no way to measure precisely a vacuum’s ergonomic feature other than checking its weight – at the handle and the total weight.

I use a weighing scale to check the total weight and a luggage scale to check the handle weight.

For steering, I check how a vacuum steers against an obstacle, how easily it turns, and how sharply.

6. Noise

I use a sound meter to check the noise levels of these machines from a few feet away.

7. Eye Test

Lastly, I’ll do an eye test on how these products perform in a real-world setting. These include checking the quality of the attachments and such.

It’s (basically) all the intangible stuff you won’t see in the spec sheet that might be deal-breakers.

I’m constantly looking for ways to improve the testing process and will add to these experiments as I go along.

Dyson Omni roller underneath

The streamlined frame deviates from typical Dyson stick vacuums and makes the Omni Glide unique, allowing it to reach deeper under furniture than any Dyson product.

I love how this feature translates to real-world use, and I’ve been using it extensively in cleaning my home.

The Omni Glide is an excellent alternative inside tiny homes with hard floors.

But it’s not usable on carpet since the rollers won’t spin even on light area rugs.

The cylindrical design isn’t optimal for handheld use, but it’s still usable, though not as good as the Micro 1.5KG.

Which Cordless Vacuum Has the Longest Battery Life [Run Time]?

Run time is one crucial aspect of choosing a cordless vacuum. So, I tested how long each model will run, and here are the results.

ModelEcoMid/AutoBoost
Roidmi X30
Non-powered tools110:21 mins45:43 mins11:26 mins
Cleaning head82:23 minsN/A11:10 mins
Tineco Pure One S12
Non-powered tools102:42 mins
(2 batteries)
N/A21:34 mins
(2 batteries)
Cleaning head75:10 mins
(2 batteries)
N/A20:20 mins
2 batteries
Roborock H7
Non-powered tools91 mins45:19 mins8:41 mins
Cleaning head56:58 mins41:03 minsN/A
DreameTech T30
Non-powered tools91 mins.N/AN/A
Cleaning head55 mins.N/AN/A
LG CordZero A9
Cleaning head86 mins
(2 batteries)
N/A30 mins
(2 batteries)
Dyson V15 Detect
Hard Floor84:19 mins41:30 mins.N/A
Carpet56:58 mins17:23 mins11:02 mins
Dyson V11 Outsize
Hard Floor85:24 minsN/AN/A
Carpet64:26 mins22:08 mins12: 36 mins
Dyson V11 Torque Drive
Hard Floor74:58 mins46:11 mins7:14 mins
Carpet57:16 mins18:33 mins9:46 mins
Shark Vertex Cordless
Non-powered tools69:50 minsN/AN/A
Cleaning nozzle36:42 mins
(hard.floor mode)
22:58 mins
(carpet mode)
N/A
DreameTech V10
Non-powered tools64 minsN/AN/A
Cleaning head37 minsN/AN/A
Miele Triflex HX1
Non-powered tools62:43 mins62:43 mins62:43 mins
Cleaning head30:06 mins21:03 mins16: 18 mins
Dyson V10 Absolute
Non-powered tools61:59 mins31:33 mins5:07 mins
Cleaning head46:45 mins25:37 mins5:42 mins
Lupe Pure
Hard floor60 minsN/AN/A
Carpet47:47 mins31:15 mins14:16 mins
Shark ION P50
Non-powered tools56:19 minsN/A19:04 mins
Cleaning head32:13 mins
(hard floor mode)
23:17 mins
(carpet mode)
N/A
Tineco A11
Non-powered tools52:44 mins
(2 batteries)
N/A21:16 mins
(2 batteries)
Cleaning head50 mins
(2 batteries)
N/A20:20 mins
(2 batteries)
Jashen V16
Non-powered tools44:50 minsN/A20:11 mins
Cleaning head38:51 mins21:34 mins7:14 mins
Dyson V8 Absolute
Non-powered tools41 mins.N/A7:23 mins.
Cleaning head31:33 mins.N/A8:31 mins.
Dyson V7 MotorHead
Non-powered tools32:43 mins.N/A5:45 mins.
Cleaning head27:58 mins.N/A7:07 mins.
Moosoo K17
Cleaning head30 minsN/A17:27 mins
Dyson Omni Glide
Cleaning head27 minsN/A8:58 mins
Tineco A10
Non-powered tools24:04 minsN/A6:43 mins
Cleaning head22:46 minsN/A6:20 mins
Dyson Micro 1.5KG
Cleaning head23:30 mins.N/A8:25 mins.

I got the results by running the vacuum from full to empty with the cleaning nozzle and non-powered tools.

The overall winner from a single battery is the Roidmi X30, clocking at a little over 110 minutes, which is way beyond its 70-minute claim.

The Roborock H7 is second at 91 minutes. But please note these results are with non-powered tools.

The overall winner is the V11 Outsize with the cleaning head, clocking at 85 minutes with the torque drive attachment on hard floors.

Likewise, in the carpet test, the V11 Outsize lasted the furthest, up to 64 minutes.

Another facet to consider with run time is if the batteries are detachable.

A removable battery makes it easier to extend the run time or replace it if it goes bad.

Which Cordless Vacuum is the Noisiest?

Next, we’ll look at the noisiest cordless vacuum options. Most of the results you’ll see below are with the cleaning nozzle attached since you’ll be using the cordless vacuum in this configuration.

ModelLowMidMax
DreameTech T3071.4 dB72.4 dB78.3 dB
DreameTech V1073.5 dB74 dB76.5 dB
Dyson V15 Detect70.3 dB72.3 dB80.8 dB
Dyson V11 Outsize73.5 dB75 dB78.8 dB
Dyson V11 Torque Drive66.5 dB68.7 dB78.9 dB
Dyson V10 Absolute64.1 dB71.6 dB76.7 dB
Dyson V8 Absolute62.8 dBN/A73.2 dB
Dyson V7 MotorHead64.1 dBN/A73.9 dB
Dyson Micro74.0 dBN/A78.5 dB
Dyson Omni Glide72 dBN/A76 dB
Jashen V1670.1dB72.7dB76.6 dB
LG CordZero A972.0 dBN/A79.4 dB
Lupe Pure74.6 dB78.4 dB81.7 dB
Miele Triflex HX177.2 dB82.8 d83.8 dB
Moosoo K1769 dBN/A71.2 dB
Roborock H770.6 dB71.9 dB76.2 dB
Roidmi X3068.5 dB71.2 dB74.1 dB
Shark ION P5066.4 dB70 dB70.8 dB
Shark Vertex Cordless IZ462H 76.3 dB78.9 dB80.8 dB
Tineco A1072.4 dBN/A77.7 dB
Tineco A1172.9 dBN/A75.4 dB
Tineco Pure One S1267.2 dBN/A70.4 dB

Unfortunately, a good-performing cordless vacuum isn’t quiet, and the models with the highest air flow and suction will be noisy.

Which Cordless Vacuum has the Strongest Suction and Airflow?

Suction is another factor we’ll examine, and here are the results from the experiments I conducted using the water lift gauge, suction gauge, and Y-gauge.

Please note that this is a recent test I’m implementing, so I have not tested all the vacuums.

ModelDirect (Water Lift)Y-gauge (unsealed)Y-gauge (sealed)
DreameTech T3094"31"85"
Dyson V15 Detect100"28"80"
Roborock H790"N/AN/A
Dyson V11 Outsize90"25"82"
LG CordZero A950"22"70"
Dyson V11 Torque Drive63"20"60"
Miele Triflex HX122"19"22"
Dyson V10 Absolute63"18"50"
Dyson V8 Absolute60"15"48"
Dyson V7 MotorHead57"10"39”
Dyson Micro 1.5KG48"8"50"
Dyson Omni Glide48"8"50"

In my opinion, the unsealed test is the most accurate of these since it represents the working suction of a vacuum.

Surprisingly, the Dreame T30 has the best overall suction with the sealed (direct) and unsealed (Y-gauge), followed by the Dyson V15 Detect.

The Roborock H7 is a surprising third, at least with the direct sealed test, followed by the V11 Outsize.

Next, let’s look at the airflow test results.

ModelEcoMid/AutoBoost
DreameTech V10
Wand24.87 CFM32.65 CFM51.89 CFM
Cleaning head23.39 CFM28.52 CFM41.31 CFM
DreameTech T30
Wand28.52 CFM36.95 CFM58.35 CFM
Cleaning head27 CFM30.64 CFM41.91 CFM
Dyson V15 Detect
Wand34.55 CFM42.38 CFM73 CFM
Cleaning Head29.98 CFM36.32 CFM69.19 CFM
Dyson V11 Outsize
Wand33.3 CFM41.07 CFM66.65 CFM
Cleaning Head29.52 CFM33.4 CFM59.5 CFM
Dyson V11 Torque Drive
Wand34.55 CFM41.91 CFM66.13 CFM
Cleaning Head28.52 CFM31.94 CFM53.58 CFM
Dyson V10 Absolute
Wand28.57 CFM36 CFM59.71 CFM
Cleaning Head26 CFM31.37 CFM49.27 CFM
Dyson V8 Absolute
Wand31.34 CFMN/A54.24 CFM
Cleaning Head26 CFMN/A36.95 CFM
Dyson V7 MotorHead
Wand29.64 CFMN/A49.68 CFM
Cleaning Head26.28 CFMN/A37.92 CFM
Dyson Micro 1.5KG
Wand24.53 CFMN/A32.41 CFM
Cleaning Head19.33 CFMN/A26.64 CFM
Dyson Omni Glide
Wand23.71 CFMN/A23.71 CFM
Cleaning Head20.35 CFMN/A26.28 CFM
Jashen V16
Wand25.48 CFM30.64 CFM39.25 CFM
Cleaning Head21.95 CFM27 CFM33.3 CFM
LG CordZero A9
Wand31 CFMN/A52 CFM
Cleaning head24.53 CFMN/A36.32 CFM
Lupe Pure
Cleaning Head22.29 CFM28.05 CFM43.06 CFM
Miele Triflex HX1
Wand34.55 CFM48.72 CFM54.88 CFM
Cleaning head35.88 CFM41.91 CFM45.75 CFM
Moosoo K17
Wand32.67 CFMN/A41.31 CFM
Cleaning head28.52 CFMN/A36.32 CFM
Roborock H7
Wand21.94 CFM28.52 CFM47 CFM
Cleaning head18.99 CFM24.87 CFM36.61 CFM
Shark ION P50
Wand31.37 CFMN/A46.27 CFM
Cleaning head24.8 CFMN/A29 CFM
Shark Vertex Cordless
Wand29.63 CFMN/A52.53 CFM
Cleaning head28.76 CFMN/A36 CFM
Tineco A10
Wand31.5 CFMN/A51 CFM
Cleaning head22.58 CFMN/A35 CFM
Tineco A11
Wand31.9 CFMN/A58 CFM
Cleaning head24.35 CFMN/A39.72 CFM
Tineco Pure One S12
Wand34 CFMN/A61.72 CFM
Cleaning head27.95 CFMN/A50.71 CFM

There’s a correlation between high airflow and performance, especially on carpet.

Cordless vacuums that scored well typically pick up more embedded sand in deep cleaning tests.

Other factors, like brush roll design, are critical, but the airflow is critical to a good-performing stick vacuum.

The Dyson V15 Detect is the best cordless vacuum with airflow, clocking 73 CFM, and the only option breaching 70 CFM.

It’s a huge reason why it’s one of the best vacuuming stick vacuums.

Cleaning Comparison

Next, we’ll examine how these vacuums compare against each other in terms of cleaning performance.

I’ve compiled this list of the (most) cordless stick vacuums I’ve tested with the new metrics.

ModelOverallHard Floors (Surface)Sand on Hard FloorCarpet (Surface)Carpet (Surface)
Dyson V11 Outsize100%100%100%100%100%
Dyson V15 Detect99.91%99.85%99.8%100%100%
Tineco A1199.80%99.88%99.40%99.80%96.45%
Dyson V11 Torque Drive99.66%99.72%99.4%99.26%100%
Lupe Pure99.65%99.60%99.30%99.82%99.90%
Dyson Omni Glide *99.42%99.35%99.50%N/AN/A
Tineco A1099.40%99.82%99.80%99.81%94.70%
Tineco Pure One S1299.17%99.88%99.90%99.34%98.30%
LG CordZero A998.60%99.70%100%99.95%94.75%
Shark Vertex Cordless98.4%99.35%99.70%99.87%94.70%
Dyson V8 Absolute98.21%99.66%99.5%97.29%97.7%
DreameTech T3097.93%98.05%99.80%99.90%94%
Dyson V10 Absolute97.21%97.21%100%98.4%97.03%
Roborock H795.76%88.05%99.50%99.52%96.00%
Moosoo K1796.21%99.58%99.80%99.65%89.40%
Jashen V1696.18%99.55%99.60%98.57%87%
Roidmi X3094.14%99.82%99.50%99.27%83.30%
Dyson V7 MotorHead93.8%81.75%99.2%99.97%94.93%
Dyson Micro 1.5KG93.08%99.45%99.7%98.17%75%
Miele Triflex HX192.78%77.75%99.73%99.77%93.9%
Shark ION P5089.75%99.82%99.7%99.23%70.2%

* No tests were done on carpets since the Omni Glide rollers won’t spin on this surface.

The V11 Outsize was the overall winner, with a 100% score in all five categories.

Close behind at number 2 is the V15 Detect, with a 99.91% average.

Some surprises are the Tineco A10 and A11, two mid-priced options in the upper echelon.

Which cordless vacuum is the best for hard floors?

One tip I’d give consumers for hard floor vacuums is to choose something with a soft roller.

Most options that have it are excellent at cleaning debris on this surface.

And despite the perfect score, I wouldn’t recommend the Dyson V11 Outsize on hard floors because it’s inefficient.

It achieved those scores using the auto and max settings.

Inefficiency is also evident in this test.

Dyson V11 Outsize sand on hard floor after initial pass

It left a trail of sand during the forward pass, which won’t be an issue with a soft roller.

Dyson V15 sand on hard floor

Consumers should also look at other features during product selection.

Brands like Shark and Dyson have introduced innovative features to help consumers clean this surface efficiently.

The Dyson V15 introduces the green laser light that amplifies dust particles like no other cordless vacuum.

Dyson V15 green laser light

The Shark Vertex upgraded its Duo Clean Nozzle, which now has combs to resist hair tangles better.

Shark Vertex cordless powerfins

Cheaper options include the Tineco A11, Dyson V8, Dyson Micro, Dyson Omni Glide, and LG CordZero, but none have the abovementioned features.

Tineco products are good on hard floors, but the steering won’t be as responsive.

The Dyson Micro and Omni-Glide are the lightest options and best suited inside smaller homes, where a high dirt capacity isn’t a must.

Avoid a product without a soft roller, as efficiency is compromised.

Products like the Miele Triflex and Dyson V7 didn’t do well on hard floors because of their low-profile nozzles.

Yes, these products will clean the small debris but won’t clean a pile of Quaker oats.

Which Cordless Vacuum is Best on Carpets?

Higher airflow options performed better on this surface. So models like the Dyson V15 Detect excelled, picking up 100% even at the auto (or middle) setting.

Other options that aced the deep cleaning experiments in the max setting include the Dyson Outsize, but that’s it.

The other scores above are done with the max setting, so if budget isn’t an issue, I recommend the V15 Detect or Outsize on carpets.

I haven’t tested the Gen5 Detect series, but those reviews are coming soon.

Cheaper alternatives on carpets include the Lupe Pure, Tineco A11, Dyson V8, Dyson V10, and Tineco Pure One S12.

These options won’t deep clean carpet as well as the Dyson models, which picked up 100%, but they are easier to push on this surface.

The best non-Dyson option is the Lupe Pure, picking up a tidy 99.9%.

Unlike a Dyson cordless, Lupe is designed more like an upright than a stick vacuum to hold more dirt.

Which Cordless Vacuum is Best for Cleaning Hair?

One underrated aspect of a cordless vacuum is its resistance to tangles. Airflow and brush roll design are critical for a stick vacuum to clean hair.

I’ve tested these vacuums on different lengths of hair strands, between five and twelve inches, and here are the results on hard floors.

Model
5"
7"s
9"
11"
12"
Shark Wandvac WS632
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
Dyson V15 Detect
100%
100%
100%
100%
80.6%
Dyson V12 Detect
100%
100%
100%
100%
80.6%
Tineco Pure One S12
88%
100%
100%
100%
100%
Tineco A10
100%
100%
100%
95%
67%
Tineco A11
100%
100%
100%
89%
63%
Dyson Outsize
100%
99%
100%
N/A
13%
Dyson V11 Torque Drive
100% i
100% i
80%
N/A
19%
Dyson V10 Absolute
100%
95%
91%
46%
N/A
Dyson V7 MotorHead
100%
99%
100%
88%
88%
Shark Vertex Pro Powered Lift-Away
100%
100%
100%
90%
96%
Shark Vertex Pro
100%
100%
86%
98%
88%
Shark Vertex Pro IZ462H
100%
100%
99.5%
97%
82.9%
Simplicity S65
100%
100%
100%
94%%
53%
Dyson V8 Absolute
100%
100%
100%
89%
63%
LG CordZero A9
98%
81%
86%
86%
N/A
Lupe Pure Cordless
82%
98%
78%
N/A
N/A
Miele Triflex HX1
98%
84%
53%
N/A
N/A
Roborock H7
100%
100%
30%
N/A
N/A
Hoover OnePWR Emerge
99%
76%
44%
N/A
N/A
Dyson Micro 1.5 KG
96%
88%
N/A
N/A
N/A
Dyson Omni Glide
26%
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A

And carpets.

Model
5"
7"s
9"
11"
12"
Shark Wandvac WS632
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
Dyson V15 Detect
100%
100%
100%
99%
98%
Dyson V12 Detect
96%
100%
92.5%
30%
N/A
Tineco Pure One S12
100%
100%
51%
N/A
N/A
Tineco A10
97%
85%
51%
N/A
N/A
Tineco A11
95%
72%
59%
N/A
N/A
Dyson Outsize
100%
100%
98%
84%
N/A
Dyson V11 Torque Drive
100%
100%
85%
61%
N/A
Dyson V10 Absolute
100%
100%
91%
56%
N/A
Dyson V7 MotorHead
100%
99%
100%
88%
88%
Shark Vertex Pro Powered Lift-Away
100%
100%
90.9%
92%
82%
Shark Vertex Pro
100%
100%
89%
95%
85%
Shark Vertex Pro IZ462H
100%
100%
99.5%
97%
82.9%
Dyson V8 Absolute
100%
100%
100%
83%
16%
LG CordZero A9
99%
100%
100%
99%
N/A
Roborock H7
100%
100%
100%
85%
N/A
Lupe Pure Cordless
82%
98%
78%
N/A
N/A
Miele Triflex HX1
100%
98%
37%
N/A
N/A
Hoover OnePWR Emerge
98%
58%
21%
N/A
N/A
Simplicity S65
94%
53%
N/A
N/A
N/A
Dyson Micro 1.5 KG
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Dyson Omni Glide
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A

The biggest surprise in these experiments is which model got the best scoresβ€”the Shark WandVac WS632, which got a 100% score across the board, better than any cordless product I’ve reviewed.

This was surprising because it didn’t have the most potent motor, but it utilized the Shark’s “Power Fins” nozzle without the soft roller.

Shark WandVac brush roll underneath

However, one issue with the Shark WandVac is its tiny dustbin, which can’t hold much hair.

Other options with a larger dustbin include the Dyson V15 Detect, Shark Vertex Pro LiftAway, and Tineco Pure One S12.

Only a handful can pick up lengthy strands over nine inches [check the table for details].

The Dyson V8, Tineco A11, A10, and Shark Vertex series are cheaper alternatives for cleaning hair.

The best handheld brush I’ve tested is the Torque Screw Tool available in the Dyson V12 and V15 Detect and all newer Dyson cordless products.

The Verdict: What is the Best Cordless Vacuum?

Despite the release of the Dyson Gen5 series, the V15 Detect is still my pick, with its efficient pickup on hard floors, carpets, and hair.

Newer sub-variants come with the latest, twice-as-bright, laser fluffy nozzle, two-in-one brush, and crevice tool tucked inside the extension tube.

It’s cheaper than the more expensive Gen5 Detect with no substantial improvement in cleaning performance.

Its 0.77-liter dustbin is enough inside most homes without needing to be emptied often.

My pick on hard floors is the Dyson V12 Detect. It’s lighter and easier to maneuver but retains the same efficient performance.

If you need more capacity, consider the Lupe Pure. Its upright, biased design can hold more dirt than a Dyson.

Another (cheaper) alternative is the Shark Vertex Pro Powered LiftAway. It won’t deep clean like a Dyson but cleans surface debris well.

Change log

  • Jan 30, 2024 – shortened the intro, giving consumers direct access to the list.
  • Feb 5, 2024 – added a description to the images.
  • Mar 7, 2024 – minor updates to the text to improve readability.