Struggling to navigate the vast sea of cordless vacuums? Look no further.
Over 30 models were rigorously tested, including two wet/dry options.
I’m here to cut through the clutter and guide you to the ideal choice that suits your needs.
These are a mixture of products I purchased and sent to me, but I can assure you that these are honest reviews since I don’t sugarcoat anything.
I’ll say the good, the bad, and the ugly head-on, ensuring you get the real scoop minus the fluff.
I compare each category’s most popular alternatives, including cordless stick vacuums, handheld, robot, and soon upright ones.
Exhaustive tests are done on various facets, such as suction power, cleaning performance, filtration, run time, and more.
For products like robot vacuums, I do additional experiments for navigation, obstacle avoidance, and many more.
I’ve categorized this list based on price (check below) and a special section for robot vacuums as a preview.
Jump to Premium | Mid-Priced | Budget | Robot Vacuums | Why Trust Us | How I Test | Run Time | Noise | Power | Cleaning | Verdict
Update for 2024: I’ve been busy testing new cordless vacuum cleaners.
Over the past few months, I’ve written about the Dyson Gen5 Detect, Gen5 Outsize, and the V15S Submarine (soon).
Other reviews are in the pipeline, namely the newer Shark cordless vacuum models like the UZ565H Pro with Clean Sense and several corded vacuums with the intent of comparing them to their cordless counterparts. Stand by for that.
So, these are exciting times for the industry.
An Overview of the Best Cordless Vacuums
Below is a summary of the test results, including run time, noise, and product specifications.
It doesn’t include all the tests, so you’ll need to read the individual reviews to see them all.
You’ll see a list of the products I’ve thoroughly tested, so if I omit something that you think should be on here, reach out, and I’ll try to test the product.
Also, I didn’t include handhelds in the list, as cordless vacuums should be versatile enough to be used on floors and above to justify their cost.
Best Premium Cordless Vacuums
Premium cordless vacuums are priced above $500.
These variants are the cream-of-the-crop options with the most power and longest run time.
These models have the highest air flow and suction figures and typically will have the best results at cleaning embedded debris on carpets.
Another benefit of these premium vacuums is the fit and finish. Most have a quick-release lever, so interchanging accessories will be straightforward.
Unfortunately, these products are costly.
Airflow: 73 CFM π Dust bin size: 0.77 liters π Fog Test: No Leaks π Sand on hard floor: 99.8% π Deep Cleaning: 100% π Weight: 6.8 lbs π Run time: up to 84:19 mins. π Recharge: 4.5 hrs. π Battery: 3600 mAh Li-ion π Noise: 80.8 dB π Warranty: 2 yrs. π Self-Standing: No
π Pros: Best all-around performance, Tracks dust, Lengthy run time, Excellent at vacuuming long hair
π Cons: Crazy expensive, Hard to push on plush rugs (or thicker carpet)
CHECK PRICE ON AMAZON
DETAILED DYSON V15 REVIEW
The V15 Detect is a culmination of all the technology from Dyson’s extensive R&D. It’s the best all-around performer on bare floors and carpeting, thanks to the high airflow. The most notable of these is the green laser that accentuates dust. I’ve tested many cordless vacuums that utilize bright LED headlights (Shark ION P50) but cannot match the V15 with highlighting dust particles. The standard brush roll also gets upgraded with these combs, helping it resist tangles better. It’s one of the best at resisting tangles from long hair strands (more than 10″). And the icing on the cake is this torque screw tool that’s the best mini turbo brush attachment for picking long hair. These innovations make the V15 Detect the best cordless vacuum I’ve tested, not just on floors but also on upholstery. Unfortunately, this vacuum isn’t perfect, and the most glaring issue is the price. The V15 Detect is expensive and the biggest roadblock for most people from purchasing it.
Airflow: 61.72 CFM π Dust bin size: 0.6 liters π Fog Test: Some Leaks π Sand on hard floor: 99.9% π Deep Cleaning: 98.3% π Weight: 6.6 lbs. π Run time: up to 51:21 mins. x 2 π Recharge: 4.5 hrs. π Battery: 2500 mAh Li-ion π Noise: 70.4 dB π Warranty: 2 yrs. π Self-Standing: No
π Pros: Great at picking up surface debris, lots of tools, two batteries, cheaper alternative, decent at cleaning embedded sand
π Cons: Less suction, Filtration isn’t fully sealed
CHECK PRICE ON AMAZON
DETAILED TINECO PURE ONE S12 REVIEW
The Tineco Pure One S12 is an underrated option and should be on your list of cordless vacuum alternatives. It doesn’t have the same level of technology or power, but this model is cheaper than the V15, with nearly the same vacuuming performance as older Dyson models. It has 13 tools (including the extension tube) with an extra long crevice tool for cleaning those hard-to-reach spots. Unfortunately, it has less airflow than the V15 Detect. Thus, it won’t clean embedded dirt as efficiently.
Airflow: 43.06 CFM π Dust bin size: 1.0 liters π Fog Test: Some Leaks π Sand on hard floor: 99.82% π Deep Cleaning: 99.9% π Weight: 10.14 lbs. π Run time: up to 60 mins. π Recharge: 3.5 hrs. π Battery: 9 Murata high drain, high capacity Li-ion π Noise: 81.7 dB π Warranty: 2 yrs. π Self-Standing: Yes
π Pros: High dustbin volume, self-standing, versatile configuration options, decent run time, capable deep cleaning alternative
π Cons: Longer strands will wrap on the brush, expensive
CHECK PRICE ON LUPE’S WEBSITE
DETAILED LUPE PURE REVIEW
The Lupe Pure Cordless is not your typical cordless stick vacuum. It’s designed to be biased against a Dyson, meaning everything is analog – there’s no LCD screen, and it uses button switches. But it performs at a premium level and is one of the best during the deep cleaning experiments (99.9%). Some downsides include the lack of a sealed filtration system and the subpar results in the hair wrap test, at least with longer strands.
Airflow: 58.74 CFM π Dust bin size: 0.35 liters π Fog Test: No Leaks π Sand on hard floor: 99.9% π Deep Cleaning: 94.1% π Weight: 5.2 lbs. π Run time: up to 63 mins. π Recharge: 3-4 hrs. π Battery: 2000 mAh Li-ion π Noise: 78.4 dB π Warranty: 1 yr. π Self-Standing: No
π Pros: Lightweight version of the V15, cheaper option, push button switch, excellent in its handheld configuration
π Cons: Tiny dustbin, still expensive
CHECK PRICE ON AMAZON
DETAILED DYSON V12 REVIEW
The Dyson V12 Detect is a lighter version of the V15 Detect – an excellent alternative for consumers who value ergonomics over cleaning performance. It doesn’t have the same power as its more expensive sibling but makes up for it with its lightweight frame. Fortunately, the lower airflow doesn’t affect its performance on hard floors since it has the same efficient pick-up.
Looking for something more specific?
Best Mid-Priced Options
Mid-priced cord-free vacuums range between $200 and under $450. It is not as powerful as its premium counterparts, but these models still provide excellent value at a lower cost.
Don’t expect these options to be as good as a high-end stick vacuum at deep cleaning carpets, but these are still decent options for homes with a mix of hard floors and carpets.
But some gems here work well on hard floors, namely the Shark Vertex Cordless and the Dyson Omni Glide.
Airflow: 48.25 CFM π Dust bin size: 1.28 liters π Fog Test: No Leaks π Sand on hard floor: 99.4% π Fog Test: No Leaks π Deep Cleaning: 92.75% π Weight: 9.04 lbs. π Run time: up to 101 mins. π Recharge: 4 hrs. π Battery: 2350 mAh Li-ion π Noise: 89.4 dB π Warranty: 2 yrs. π Self-Standing: Yes
π Pros: Redesigned DuoClean nozzle excellent at vacuuming long hair, self-standing, large dustbin, detachable battery, excellent especially on hard floors
π Cons: Noisy, subpar run time
BUY NOW ON AMAZON
DETAILED SHARK VERTEX PRO REVIEW
Shark is one of the innovators I’m talking about earlier, and their innovation is the Duo Clean system. The Vertex Pro improved upon the issues with its older sibling. This model runs longer since it comes with two batteries and has an improved interface with buttons instead of a slide switch. One downgrade is the lower airflow, so there’s a slight degradation in cleaning performance.
Airflow: 31.94 CFM π Dust bin size: 0.18 liters π Fog Test: No Leaks π Sand on hard floor: 99.35% π Deep Cleaning: N/A π Weight: 4.18 lbs. π Run time: up to 23:30 mins. π Recharge: 3.5 hrs. π Battery: 2500 mAh Li-ion π Noise: 76 dB π Warranty: 2 yrs. π Self-Standing: No
π Pros: First 360-degree steering, lightweight, short run time, can’t pick up on carpet
π Cons: Small dustbin, noisy
CHECK PRICE ON AMAZON
DETAILED DYSON OMNI GLIDE REVIEW
Most vacuum cleaners go in four directions: forward, backward, left, and right, but the Omni Glide breaks that mold with its industry-first 360-degree steering. Dyson makes this possible with the twin roller system and four caster wheels underneath, making it possible to make a complete turn while vacuuming in both directions. The streamlined frame deviates from typical Dyson stick vacuums and makes the Omni Glide unique, allowing it to reach deeper under furniture than any Dyson product. I love how this feature translates to real-world use, and I’ve been using it extensively in cleaning my home. The Omni Glide is an excellent alternative inside tiny homes with hard floors. But it’s not usable on carpet since the rollers won’t spin even on light area rugs. The cylindrical design isn’t optimal for handheld use, but it’s still usable, though not as good as the Micro 1.5KG.
Airflow: 58 CFM π Dust bin size: 0.6 liters π Fog Test: Some Leaks π Sand on hard floor: 99.4% π Deep Cleaning: 96.45% π Weight: 3.74 lbs. π Run time: up to 26:44 mins. x 2 π Recharge: 3.5 – 4 hrs. π Battery: 2,000 mAH Li-ion π Noise: 75.4 dB π Warranty: 2 yrs. π Self-Standing: No
π Pros: Superb debris pick up, lots of tools, lightweight frame, above-average deep cleaning
π Cons: Short run time, noisy, shallow turning radius
CHECK PRICE ON AMAZON
The Tineco A11 is (perhaps) the best value-for-money option of the stick vacuums I’ve tested, providing high-end cleaning at a mid-level price. Tineco is a brand trying to unseat Dyson in the cordless vacuum niche, and the A11 is one of their outstanding products. Depending on the variant you choose, it comes with only the standard nozzle or includes the soft roller attachment. One selling point for the A11 is the sheer number of attachments. These tools are helpful in their own right, factoring in the lightweight body. The A11 is excellent for above-the-floor use. There’s no glaring issue with the A11, but the biggest concern with this vacuum is its steering.
Best Budget Alternatives
Lastly are the cheap cordless vacuums. These variants are the least expensive and excellent for budget-conscious folks looking for a bang-for-the-buck cordless vacuum.
Surprisingly, some alternatives here have above-average airflow.
Thus, the cleaning performance difference isn’t far from their mid-priced or premium counterparts.
The biggest downside to these affordable alternatives is the lack of filtration. Despite claims of HEPA filtration, none passed the fog test.
So that means fine bits of dust and allergens will seep through the exhaust.
It’s not something I’d recommend for allergy sufferers.
Airflow: 51 CFM. π Dust bin size: 0.4 liters π Fog Test: Heavy Leaks π Sand on hard floor: 99.8% π Deep Cleaning: 94.7% π Weight: 2.87 lbs. π Run time: up to 26:44 mins. π Recharge: 3 to 4 hrs. π Battery: 2500 mAh Li-ion π Noise: 77.7dB π Warranty: 2 yrs. π Self-Standing: No
π Pros: Excellent performance all-around, above-average deep cleaning, cheap sub $200 alternative
π Cons: Noisy, not so shark steering
CHECK PRICE ON AMAZON
DETAILED TINECO A10 REVIEW
The best budget alternative right now is the Tineco A10. Once priced at the mid-level range, Tineco’s new releases pushed its price down. So, this isn’t your typical budget cordless vacuum. It possesses above-average airflow and a brush roll similar to the more expensive Tineco A11. Therefore, it’s no surprise that it performs closely to the Tineco A11.
Airflow: 41.31 CFM π Dust bin size: 0.5 liters π Fog Test: Heavy Leaks π Sand on hard floor: 99.8% π Deep Cleaning: 89.4% π Weight: 2.79 lbs. π Run time: up to 30 mins. π Recharge: 4 hrs. π Battery: 2200 mAh Li-ion π Noise: 71.2 dB π Warranty: 1 yr. π Self-Standing: No
π Pros: Cheap option, surprisingly good debris pick up, lightweight
π Cons: Poor filtration, noisy
Last but not least on this list is the Moosoo K17. This budget stick vacuum is one of the best-performing options on the list and another excellent value option for budget-conscious shoppers. It picked up a very high percentage with surface and deep cleaning tests. But don’t expect too much from it with fit and finish, as it won’t have the same quality as premium brands. Nonetheless, it’s excellent at debris pick-up, which is why it’s so popular. Unfortunately, the Moosoo K17 is no longer available on Amazon but still is on stores like Walmart and Moosoo’s website. Another issue with the K17 is its lack of filtration, as with most budget cordless vacuums.
Best Robot Vacuums
Robot vacuums are excellent alternatives for people who want to automate the vacuuming task.
Technology has improved to the point that these are viable alternatives because of the latest navigation and battery technology enhancements.
One (obvious) downside is the higher price compared to a stick vacuum because of the added technology and sophistication.
Brands like Roborock and iRobot are the most popular options.
Still, brands like Yeedi, Shark, and Dreame offer consumers alternative options if Roomba or Roborock is too costly.
Airflow: 13.39 CFM π Sand on Hard Floor: 99.6% π Deep Cleaning: 77.95%
Side brush: One π Brush roll: Twin rubber extractors
Navigation: LIDAR + Front Camera π Map saving: Yes π Number of maps: 4 π Containment: Yes π Selective Room cleaning: Yes π Recharge & Resume: Yes
Self-Empty: Yes π Bag capacity: 2.5liters π Dustbin capacity: 400ml
Mopping: Yes π Clean water tank capacity: 3 liters π Dirty water tank capacity: 2.5 liters π Water tank (inside robot): 200ml
Side brush: One π Brush roll: Twin rubber extractors
Battery: 5200 mAh Li-ion π Run time: 180 minutes π Noise: 72.9 dB
π Pros: Efficient navigation, do-it-all base station, above-average surface vacuuming performance
π Cons: Costly, base station takes up lots of space
CHECK PRICE ON AMAZON
DETAILED ROBOROCK S7 MAXV ULTRA REVIEW
The S7 MaxV Ultra is one of Roborock’s latest products and the first with pad-washing and self-emptying features. With the unveiling of the S8 MaxV Ultra, expect the S7 MaxV price to trickle down, which is excellent news to consumers because of its cost savings. This is the best robot vacuum (for now) because it combines efficient navigation, obstacle avoidance, hands-free convenience, a feature-rich app, and above-average cleaning performance. It doesn’t have the deep cleaning capability of a Roomba, but its above-average surface debris cleaning, mopping, and proficient navigation make up for this deficiency. One significant roadblock is the hefty price tag. The Roborock S7 MaxV Ultra is (easily) one of the more expensive options available.
Airflow: 14.98 CFM π Sand on Hard Floor: 98.3% π Deep Cleaning: 77.95%
Side brush: One π Brush roll: All-rubber brush
Navigation: LIDAR + Front Camera π Map saving: Yes π Number of maps: 4 π Containment: Yes π Selective Room cleaning: Yes π Recharge & Resume: Yes
Self-Empty: Yes π Bag capacity: 2.5liters π Dustbin capacity: 350 ml
Mopping: Yes π Clean water tank capacity: 2.5 liters π Dirty water tank capacity: 2.4 liters π Water tank (inside robot): N/A
Battery: 5200 mAh Li-ion π Run time: 210 mins π Noise: 63.6 dB
π Pros: Cheaper than a Roborock, proficient navigation, not very noisy, above-average mopping performance
π Cons: Not as good at avoiding objects, tall base station
CHECK PRICE ON AMAZON
DETAILED DREAME L10S REVIEW
A cheaper alternative to the Roborock S7 MaxV Ultra is the Dreame L10S Ultra, which has a versatile base station capable of washing the pads and emptying the dustbin. While it picked up the same percentage in the deep cleaning experiment, the surface cleaning wasn’t as good because of the weaker suction. Thus, it doesn’t vacuum surface debris as efficiently. Nonetheless, it’s a cheaper alternative worth considering if the S7 MaxV is too costly.
Why Should You Trust This Comparison?
One simple reason is that I’ve done comprehensive tests for each product.
I’ve spent countless hours testing each cordless vacuum to gather the data needed for this comparison.
These comprehensive tests include cleaning tests on surface and embedded dirt, run time, filtration, usability, and more.
I then tabulate these results on a spreadsheet to see how each model fares against the other.
Most of the products featured in this comparison are purchased to prevent bias, but I don’t hesitate to share the bad points even with the manufacturer-sent items.
That’s why I don’t accept payments for these products, but the item itself is enough.
I’ll admit, when I started this site nearly a decade ago, I was one of those sites that regurgitated information.
However, I pivoted to testing products when an opportunity came up. And I’ve been doing so ever since.
Hence, you’ll still see old articles in which I did not test the product. But I’m saying this for transparency’s sake.
How I Test These Vacuums?
Here’s the list of experiments I put in every cordless vacuum I review.
These tests can take several days to complete and are exhaustive in checking how each product holds up.
1. Cleaning Tests
One of the most critical of these experiments is the cleaning test.
I put these vacuums through a grueling series of tests on different debris types, from coffee grounds, pet litter, quinoa, sand, hair, quaker oats, and more.
These experiments aim to check how well these products pick up debris on surfaces, such as hard floors and lowβand mid-pile carpets.
I used 50 grams for surface debris experiments and 100 grams for deep cleaning tests.
2. Airflow and Suction Power Tests
Manufacturers don’t have a universal metric for disclosing suction, so I use three tools to measure airflow and suction.
These are the anemometer, water lift gauge, and Y-gauge.
Please realize that I’m not the first to use them as other YouTube Vloggers have used these to check suction, but these are practical tools, so I use them.
After countless tests, I found a correlation between high airflow and good cleaning performance on carpets.
Sure, other factors come into consideration, like nozzle design, but airflow is critical, at least on carpets.
I do three suction experiments.
The first is a direct test using a water lift gauge and a short pipe as a bridge.
It’s not the most accurate since high-suction vacuums like Dyson flash an “airway obstructed” error, and there’s no way to get a consistent baseline result.
I used to drill a hole to act as a release valve, but this only works for cordless vacuums with less suction.
Even with this hole, high-powered models still have that blockage error.
The subsequent trial is an unsealed test using a water lift gauge and Y-gauge.
It’s the most accurate suction test since it has the least number of variables involved.
The last test is the sealed test with the water lift and Y-gauge, where I cover the open end with my palm.
3. Fog test
Another important consideration when choosing a cordless vacuum is filtration.
Many brands claim HEPA filtration, but what’s their proof? One method is using a fog machine.
It provides a visual cue if the vacuum can keep the fog inside. The fog represents debris inside the dustbin.
This experiment tests not only the filter but also the seals around it. Not many cordless pass this test, which you’ll find out later.
4. Run time test
How long a cordless vacuum will run is another critical component of a cordless vacuum.
With the improved battery technology, these machines will run further than ever.
The testing process is simple: turn on the vacuum and time it with a mobile phone timer until the battery runs out.
I do these tests with the main nozzle and non-powered tools to give consumers a more realistic expectation of how long a product will run.
But note that these results can degrade over time as Li-ion batteries have a fixed number of charge and recharge cycles before deteriorating.
However, good brands will provide a few years of excellent service with proper battery care, and popular brands like Dyson have a wide range of replacement battery alternatives.
5. Ergonomics [Steering, Handle Weight, and Overall Weight]
Next in line is ergonomics. There’s no way to measure precisely a vacuum’s ergonomic feature other than checking its weight – at the handle and the total weight.
I use a weighing scale to check the total weight and a luggage scale to check the handle weight.
For steering, I check how a vacuum steers against an obstacle, how easily it turns, and how sharply.
6. Noise
I use a sound meter to check the noise levels of these machines from a few feet away.
7. Eye Test
Lastly, I’ll do an eye test on how these products perform in a real-world setting. These include checking the quality of the attachments and such.
It’s (basically) all the intangible stuff you won’t see in the spec sheet that might be deal-breakers.
I’m constantly looking for ways to improve the testing process and will add to these experiments as I go along.
The streamlined frame deviates from typical Dyson stick vacuums and makes the Omni Glide unique, allowing it to reach deeper under furniture than any Dyson product.
I love how this feature translates to real-world use, and I’ve been using it extensively in cleaning my home.
The Omni Glide is an excellent alternative inside tiny homes with hard floors.
But it’s not usable on carpet since the rollers won’t spin even on light area rugs.
The cylindrical design isn’t optimal for handheld use, but it’s still usable, though not as good as the Micro 1.5KG.
Which Cordless Vacuum Has the Longest Battery Life [Run Time]?
Run time is one crucial aspect of choosing a cordless vacuum. So, I tested how long each model will run, and here are the results.
Model | Eco | Mid/Auto | Boost |
---|---|---|---|
Roidmi X30 | |||
Non-powered tools | 110:21 mins | 45:43 mins | 11:26 mins |
Cleaning head | 82:23 mins | N/A | 11:10 mins |
Tineco Pure One S12 | |||
Non-powered tools | 102:42 mins (2 batteries) | N/A | 21:34 mins (2 batteries) |
Cleaning head | 75:10 mins (2 batteries) | N/A | 20:20 mins 2 batteries |
Roborock H7 | |||
Non-powered tools | 91 mins | 45:19 mins | 8:41 mins |
Cleaning head | 56:58 mins | 41:03 mins | N/A |
DreameTech T30 | |||
Non-powered tools | 91 mins. | N/A | N/A |
Cleaning head | 55 mins. | N/A | N/A |
LG CordZero A9 | |||
Cleaning head | 86 mins (2 batteries) | N/A | 30 mins (2 batteries) |
Dyson V15 Detect | |||
Hard Floor | 84:19 mins | 41:30 mins. | N/A |
Carpet | 56:58 mins | 17:23 mins | 11:02 mins |
Dyson V11 Outsize | |||
Hard Floor | 85:24 mins | N/A | N/A |
Carpet | 64:26 mins | 22:08 mins | 12: 36 mins |
Dyson V11 Torque Drive | |||
Hard Floor | 74:58 mins | 46:11 mins | 7:14 mins |
Carpet | 57:16 mins | 18:33 mins | 9:46 mins |
Shark Vertex Cordless | |||
Non-powered tools | 69:50 mins | N/A | N/A |
Cleaning nozzle | 36:42 mins (hard.floor mode) | 22:58 mins (carpet mode) | N/A |
DreameTech V10 | |||
Non-powered tools | 64 mins | N/A | N/A |
Cleaning head | 37 mins | N/A | N/A |
Miele Triflex HX1 | |||
Non-powered tools | 62:43 mins | 62:43 mins | 62:43 mins |
Cleaning head | 30:06 mins | 21:03 mins | 16: 18 mins |
Dyson V10 Absolute | |||
Non-powered tools | 61:59 mins | 31:33 mins | 5:07 mins |
Cleaning head | 46:45 mins | 25:37 mins | 5:42 mins |
Lupe Pure | |||
Hard floor | 60 mins | N/A | N/A |
Carpet | 47:47 mins | 31:15 mins | 14:16 mins |
Shark ION P50 | |||
Non-powered tools | 56:19 mins | N/A | 19:04 mins |
Cleaning head | 32:13 mins (hard floor mode) | 23:17 mins (carpet mode) | N/A |
Tineco A11 | |||
Non-powered tools | 52:44 mins (2 batteries) | N/A | 21:16 mins (2 batteries) |
Cleaning head | 50 mins (2 batteries) | N/A | 20:20 mins (2 batteries) |
Jashen V16 | |||
Non-powered tools | 44:50 mins | N/A | 20:11 mins |
Cleaning head | 38:51 mins | 21:34 mins | 7:14 mins |
Dyson V8 Absolute | |||
Non-powered tools | 41 mins. | N/A | 7:23 mins. |
Cleaning head | 31:33 mins. | N/A | 8:31 mins. |
Dyson V7 MotorHead | |||
Non-powered tools | 32:43 mins. | N/A | 5:45 mins. |
Cleaning head | 27:58 mins. | N/A | 7:07 mins. |
Moosoo K17 | |||
Cleaning head | 30 mins | N/A | 17:27 mins |
Dyson Omni Glide | |||
Cleaning head | 27 mins | N/A | 8:58 mins |
Tineco A10 | |||
Non-powered tools | 24:04 mins | N/A | 6:43 mins |
Cleaning head | 22:46 mins | N/A | 6:20 mins |
Dyson Micro 1.5KG | |||
Cleaning head | 23:30 mins. | N/A | 8:25 mins. |
I got the results by running the vacuum from full to empty with the cleaning nozzle and non-powered tools.
The overall winner from a single battery is the Roidmi X30, clocking at a little over 110 minutes, which is way beyond its 70-minute claim.
The Roborock H7 is second at 91 minutes. But please note these results are with non-powered tools.
The overall winner is the V11 Outsize with the cleaning head, clocking at 85 minutes with the torque drive attachment on hard floors.
Likewise, in the carpet test, the V11 Outsize lasted the furthest, up to 64 minutes.
Another facet to consider with run time is if the batteries are detachable.
A removable battery makes it easier to extend the run time or replace it if it goes bad.
Which Cordless Vacuum is the Noisiest?
Next, we’ll look at the noisiest cordless vacuum options. Most of the results you’ll see below are with the cleaning nozzle attached since you’ll be using the cordless vacuum in this configuration.
Model | Low | Mid | Max |
---|---|---|---|
DreameTech T30 | 71.4 dB | 72.4 dB | 78.3 dB |
DreameTech V10 | 73.5 dB | 74 dB | 76.5 dB |
Dyson V15 Detect | 70.3 dB | 72.3 dB | 80.8 dB |
Dyson V11 Outsize | 73.5 dB | 75 dB | 78.8 dB |
Dyson V11 Torque Drive | 66.5 dB | 68.7 dB | 78.9 dB |
Dyson V10 Absolute | 64.1 dB | 71.6 dB | 76.7 dB |
Dyson V8 Absolute | 62.8 dB | N/A | 73.2 dB |
Dyson V7 MotorHead | 64.1 dB | N/A | 73.9 dB |
Dyson Micro | 74.0 dB | N/A | 78.5 dB |
Dyson Omni Glide | 72 dB | N/A | 76 dB |
Jashen V16 | 70.1dB | 72.7dB | 76.6 dB |
LG CordZero A9 | 72.0 dB | N/A | 79.4 dB |
Lupe Pure | 74.6 dB | 78.4 dB | 81.7 dB |
Miele Triflex HX1 | 77.2 dB | 82.8 d | 83.8 dB |
Moosoo K17 | 69 dB | N/A | 71.2 dB |
Roborock H7 | 70.6 dB | 71.9 dB | 76.2 dB |
Roidmi X30 | 68.5 dB | 71.2 dB | 74.1 dB |
Shark ION P50 | 66.4 dB | 70 dB | 70.8 dB |
Shark Vertex Cordless IZ462H | 76.3 dB | 78.9 dB | 80.8 dB |
Tineco A10 | 72.4 dB | N/A | 77.7 dB |
Tineco A11 | 72.9 dB | N/A | 75.4 dB |
Tineco Pure One S12 | 67.2 dB | N/A | 70.4 dB |
Unfortunately, a good-performing cordless vacuum isn’t quiet, and the models with the highest air flow and suction will be noisy.
Which Cordless Vacuum has the Strongest Suction and Airflow?
Suction is another factor we’ll examine, and here are the results from the experiments I conducted using the water lift gauge, suction gauge, and Y-gauge.
Please note that this is a recent test I’m implementing, so I have not tested all the vacuums.
Model | Direct (Water Lift) | Y-gauge (unsealed) | Y-gauge (sealed) |
---|---|---|---|
DreameTech T30 | 94" | 31" | 85" |
Dyson V15 Detect | 100" | 28" | 80" |
Roborock H7 | 90" | N/A | N/A |
Dyson V11 Outsize | 90" | 25" | 82" |
LG CordZero A9 | 50" | 22" | 70" |
Dyson V11 Torque Drive | 63" | 20" | 60" |
Miele Triflex HX1 | 22" | 19" | 22" |
Dyson V10 Absolute | 63" | 18" | 50" |
Dyson V8 Absolute | 60" | 15" | 48" |
Dyson V7 MotorHead | 57" | 10" | 39β |
Dyson Micro 1.5KG | 48" | 8" | 50" |
Dyson Omni Glide | 48" | 8" | 50" |
In my opinion, the unsealed test is the most accurate of these since it represents the working suction of a vacuum.
Surprisingly, the Dreame T30 has the best overall suction with the sealed (direct) and unsealed (Y-gauge), followed by the Dyson V15 Detect.
The Roborock H7 is a surprising third, at least with the direct sealed test, followed by the V11 Outsize.
Next, let’s look at the airflow test results.
Model | Eco | Mid/Auto | Boost |
---|---|---|---|
DreameTech V10 | |||
Wand | 24.87 CFM | 32.65 CFM | 51.89 CFM |
Cleaning head | 23.39 CFM | 28.52 CFM | 41.31 CFM |
DreameTech T30 | |||
Wand | 28.52 CFM | 36.95 CFM | 58.35 CFM |
Cleaning head | 27 CFM | 30.64 CFM | 41.91 CFM |
Dyson V15 Detect | |||
Wand | 34.55 CFM | 42.38 CFM | 73 CFM |
Cleaning Head | 29.98 CFM | 36.32 CFM | 69.19 CFM |
Dyson V11 Outsize | |||
Wand | 33.3 CFM | 41.07 CFM | 66.65 CFM |
Cleaning Head | 29.52 CFM | 33.4 CFM | 59.5 CFM |
Dyson V11 Torque Drive | |||
Wand | 34.55 CFM | 41.91 CFM | 66.13 CFM |
Cleaning Head | 28.52 CFM | 31.94 CFM | 53.58 CFM |
Dyson V10 Absolute | |||
Wand | 28.57 CFM | 36 CFM | 59.71 CFM |
Cleaning Head | 26 CFM | 31.37 CFM | 49.27 CFM |
Dyson V8 Absolute | |||
Wand | 31.34 CFM | N/A | 54.24 CFM |
Cleaning Head | 26 CFM | N/A | 36.95 CFM |
Dyson V7 MotorHead | |||
Wand | 29.64 CFM | N/A | 49.68 CFM |
Cleaning Head | 26.28 CFM | N/A | 37.92 CFM |
Dyson Micro 1.5KG | |||
Wand | 24.53 CFM | N/A | 32.41 CFM |
Cleaning Head | 19.33 CFM | N/A | 26.64 CFM |
Dyson Omni Glide | |||
Wand | 23.71 CFM | N/A | 23.71 CFM |
Cleaning Head | 20.35 CFM | N/A | 26.28 CFM |
Jashen V16 | |||
Wand | 25.48 CFM | 30.64 CFM | 39.25 CFM |
Cleaning Head | 21.95 CFM | 27 CFM | 33.3 CFM |
LG CordZero A9 | |||
Wand | 31 CFM | N/A | 52 CFM |
Cleaning head | 24.53 CFM | N/A | 36.32 CFM |
Lupe Pure | |||
Cleaning Head | 22.29 CFM | 28.05 CFM | 43.06 CFM |
Miele Triflex HX1 | |||
Wand | 34.55 CFM | 48.72 CFM | 54.88 CFM |
Cleaning head | 35.88 CFM | 41.91 CFM | 45.75 CFM |
Moosoo K17 | |||
Wand | 32.67 CFM | N/A | 41.31 CFM |
Cleaning head | 28.52 CFM | N/A | 36.32 CFM |
Roborock H7 | |||
Wand | 21.94 CFM | 28.52 CFM | 47 CFM |
Cleaning head | 18.99 CFM | 24.87 CFM | 36.61 CFM |
Shark ION P50 | |||
Wand | 31.37 CFM | N/A | 46.27 CFM |
Cleaning head | 24.8 CFM | N/A | 29 CFM |
Shark Vertex Cordless | |||
Wand | 29.63 CFM | N/A | 52.53 CFM |
Cleaning head | 28.76 CFM | N/A | 36 CFM |
Tineco A10 | |||
Wand | 31.5 CFM | N/A | 51 CFM |
Cleaning head | 22.58 CFM | N/A | 35 CFM |
Tineco A11 | |||
Wand | 31.9 CFM | N/A | 58 CFM |
Cleaning head | 24.35 CFM | N/A | 39.72 CFM |
Tineco Pure One S12 | |||
Wand | 34 CFM | N/A | 61.72 CFM |
Cleaning head | 27.95 CFM | N/A | 50.71 CFM |
There’s a correlation between high airflow and performance, especially on carpet.
Cordless vacuums that scored well typically pick up more embedded sand in deep cleaning tests.
Other factors, like brush roll design, are critical, but the airflow is critical to a good-performing stick vacuum.
The Dyson V15 Detect is the best cordless vacuum with airflow, clocking 73 CFM, and the only option breaching 70 CFM.
It’s a huge reason why it’s one of the best vacuuming stick vacuums.
Cleaning Comparison
Next, we’ll examine how these vacuums compare against each other in terms of cleaning performance.
I’ve compiled this list of the (most) cordless stick vacuums I’ve tested with the new metrics.
Model | Overall | Hard Floors (Surface) | Sand on Hard Floor | Carpet (Surface) | Carpet (Surface) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dyson V11 Outsize | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
Dyson V15 Detect | 99.91% | 99.85% | 99.8% | 100% | 100% |
Tineco A11 | 99.80% | 99.88% | 99.40% | 99.80% | 96.45% |
Dyson V11 Torque Drive | 99.66% | 99.72% | 99.4% | 99.26% | 100% |
Lupe Pure | 99.65% | 99.60% | 99.30% | 99.82% | 99.90% |
Dyson Omni Glide * | 99.42% | 99.35% | 99.50% | N/A | N/A |
Tineco A10 | 99.40% | 99.82% | 99.80% | 99.81% | 94.70% |
Tineco Pure One S12 | 99.17% | 99.88% | 99.90% | 99.34% | 98.30% |
LG CordZero A9 | 98.60% | 99.70% | 100% | 99.95% | 94.75% |
Shark Vertex Cordless | 98.4% | 99.35% | 99.70% | 99.87% | 94.70% |
Dyson V8 Absolute | 98.21% | 99.66% | 99.5% | 97.29% | 97.7% |
DreameTech T30 | 97.93% | 98.05% | 99.80% | 99.90% | 94% |
Dyson V10 Absolute | 97.21% | 97.21% | 100% | 98.4% | 97.03% |
Roborock H7 | 95.76% | 88.05% | 99.50% | 99.52% | 96.00% |
Moosoo K17 | 96.21% | 99.58% | 99.80% | 99.65% | 89.40% |
Jashen V16 | 96.18% | 99.55% | 99.60% | 98.57% | 87% |
Roidmi X30 | 94.14% | 99.82% | 99.50% | 99.27% | 83.30% |
Dyson V7 MotorHead | 93.8% | 81.75% | 99.2% | 99.97% | 94.93% |
Dyson Micro 1.5KG | 93.08% | 99.45% | 99.7% | 98.17% | 75% |
Miele Triflex HX1 | 92.78% | 77.75% | 99.73% | 99.77% | 93.9% |
Shark ION P50 | 89.75% | 99.82% | 99.7% | 99.23% | 70.2% |
* No tests were done on carpets since the Omni Glide rollers won’t spin on this surface.
The V11 Outsize was the overall winner, with a 100% score in all five categories.
Close behind at number 2 is the V15 Detect, with a 99.91% average.
Some surprises are the Tineco A10 and A11, two mid-priced options in the upper echelon.
Which cordless vacuum is the best for hard floors?
One tip I’d give consumers for hard floor vacuums is to choose something with a soft roller.
Most options that have it are excellent at cleaning debris on this surface.
And despite the perfect score, I wouldn’t recommend the Dyson V11 Outsize on hard floors because it’s inefficient.
It achieved those scores using the auto and max settings.
Inefficiency is also evident in this test.
It left a trail of sand during the forward pass, which won’t be an issue with a soft roller.
Consumers should also look at other features during product selection.
Brands like Shark and Dyson have introduced innovative features to help consumers clean this surface efficiently.
The Dyson V15 introduces the green laser light that amplifies dust particles like no other cordless vacuum.
The Shark Vertex upgraded its Duo Clean Nozzle, which now has combs to resist hair tangles better.
Cheaper options include the Tineco A11, Dyson V8, Dyson Micro, Dyson Omni Glide, and LG CordZero, but none have the abovementioned features.
Tineco products are good on hard floors, but the steering won’t be as responsive.
The Dyson Micro and Omni-Glide are the lightest options and best suited inside smaller homes, where a high dirt capacity isn’t a must.
Avoid a product without a soft roller, as efficiency is compromised.
Products like the Miele Triflex and Dyson V7 didn’t do well on hard floors because of their low-profile nozzles.
Yes, these products will clean the small debris but won’t clean a pile of Quaker oats.
Which Cordless Vacuum is Best on Carpets?
Higher airflow options performed better on this surface. So models like the Dyson V15 Detect excelled, picking up 100% even at the auto (or middle) setting.
Other options that aced the deep cleaning experiments in the max setting include the Dyson Outsize, but that’s it.
The other scores above are done with the max setting, so if budget isn’t an issue, I recommend the V15 Detect or Outsize on carpets.
I haven’t tested the Gen5 Detect series, but those reviews are coming soon.
Cheaper alternatives on carpets include the Lupe Pure, Tineco A11, Dyson V8, Dyson V10, and Tineco Pure One S12.
These options won’t deep clean carpet as well as the Dyson models, which picked up 100%, but they are easier to push on this surface.
The best non-Dyson option is the Lupe Pure, picking up a tidy 99.9%.
Unlike a Dyson cordless, Lupe is designed more like an upright than a stick vacuum to hold more dirt.
Which Cordless Vacuum is Best for Cleaning Hair?
One underrated aspect of a cordless vacuum is its resistance to tangles. Airflow and brush roll design are critical for a stick vacuum to clean hair.
I’ve tested these vacuums on different lengths of hair strands, between five and twelve inches, and here are the results on hard floors.
Model | 5" | 7"s | 9" | 11" | 12" |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Shark Wandvac WS632 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
Dyson V15 Detect | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 80.6% |
Dyson V12 Detect | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 80.6% |
Tineco Pure One S12 | 88% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
Tineco A10 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 67% |
Tineco A11 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 89% | 63% |
Dyson Outsize | 100% | 99% | 100% | N/A | 13% |
Dyson V11 Torque Drive | 100% i | 100% i | 80% | N/A | 19% |
Dyson V10 Absolute | 100% | 95% | 91% | 46% | N/A |
Dyson V7 MotorHead | 100% | 99% | 100% | 88% | 88% |
Shark Vertex Pro Powered Lift-Away | 100% | 100% | 100% | 90% | 96% |
Shark Vertex Pro | 100% | 100% | 86% | 98% | 88% |
Shark Vertex Pro IZ462H | 100% | 100% | 99.5% | 97% | 82.9% |
Simplicity S65 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94%% | 53% |
Dyson V8 Absolute | 100% | 100% | 100% | 89% | 63% |
LG CordZero A9 | 98% | 81% | 86% | 86% | N/A |
Lupe Pure Cordless | 82% | 98% | 78% | N/A | N/A |
Miele Triflex HX1 | 98% | 84% | 53% | N/A | N/A |
Roborock H7 | 100% | 100% | 30% | N/A | N/A |
Hoover OnePWR Emerge | 99% | 76% | 44% | N/A | N/A |
Dyson Micro 1.5 KG | 96% | 88% | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Dyson Omni Glide | 26% | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
And carpets.
Model | 5" | 7"s | 9" | 11" | 12" |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Shark Wandvac WS632 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
Dyson V15 Detect | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 98% |
Dyson V12 Detect | 96% | 100% | 92.5% | 30% | N/A |
Tineco Pure One S12 | 100% | 100% | 51% | N/A | N/A |
Tineco A10 | 97% | 85% | 51% | N/A | N/A |
Tineco A11 | 95% | 72% | 59% | N/A | N/A |
Dyson Outsize | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | N/A |
Dyson V11 Torque Drive | 100% | 100% | 85% | 61% | N/A |
Dyson V10 Absolute | 100% | 100% | 91% | 56% | N/A |
Dyson V7 MotorHead | 100% | 99% | 100% | 88% | 88% |
Shark Vertex Pro Powered Lift-Away | 100% | 100% | 90.9% | 92% | 82% |
Shark Vertex Pro | 100% | 100% | 89% | 95% | 85% |
Shark Vertex Pro IZ462H | 100% | 100% | 99.5% | 97% | 82.9% |
Dyson V8 Absolute | 100% | 100% | 100% | 83% | 16% |
LG CordZero A9 | 99% | 100% | 100% | 99% | N/A |
Roborock H7 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 85% | N/A |
Lupe Pure Cordless | 82% | 98% | 78% | N/A | N/A |
Miele Triflex HX1 | 100% | 98% | 37% | N/A | N/A |
Hoover OnePWR Emerge | 98% | 58% | 21% | N/A | N/A |
Simplicity S65 | 94% | 53% | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Dyson Micro 1.5 KG | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Dyson Omni Glide | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
The biggest surprise in these experiments is which model got the best scoresβthe Shark WandVac WS632, which got a 100% score across the board, better than any cordless product I’ve reviewed.
This was surprising because it didn’t have the most potent motor, but it utilized the Shark’s “Power Fins” nozzle without the soft roller.
However, one issue with the Shark WandVac is its tiny dustbin, which can’t hold much hair.
Other options with a larger dustbin include the Dyson V15 Detect, Shark Vertex Pro LiftAway, and Tineco Pure One S12.
Only a handful can pick up lengthy strands over nine inches [check the table for details].
The Dyson V8, Tineco A11, A10, and Shark Vertex series are cheaper alternatives for cleaning hair.
The best handheld brush I’ve tested is the Torque Screw Tool available in the Dyson V12 and V15 Detect and all newer Dyson cordless products.
The Verdict: What is the Best Cordless Vacuum?
Despite the release of the Dyson Gen5 series, the V15 Detect is still my pick, with its efficient pickup on hard floors, carpets, and hair.
Newer sub-variants come with the latest, twice-as-bright, laser fluffy nozzle, two-in-one brush, and crevice tool tucked inside the extension tube.
It’s cheaper than the more expensive Gen5 Detect with no substantial improvement in cleaning performance.
Its 0.77-liter dustbin is enough inside most homes without needing to be emptied often.
My pick on hard floors is the Dyson V12 Detect. It’s lighter and easier to maneuver but retains the same efficient performance.
If you need more capacity, consider the Lupe Pure. Its upright, biased design can hold more dirt than a Dyson.
Another (cheaper) alternative is the Shark Vertex Pro Powered LiftAway. It won’t deep clean like a Dyson but cleans surface debris well.
Change log
- Jan 30, 2024 – shortened the intro, giving consumers direct access to the list.
- Feb 5, 2024 – added a description to the images.
- Mar 7, 2024 – minor updates to the text to improve readability.